Monday, June 11, 2012

Boycott American Women Blog

Recently, I stumbled upon a blog that just made me both laugh and nauseous, all at the same time. It's a blog written by a man (or men), basically talking about all the bad points of American Women. I'm not 100% sure who the lamebrain behind this was, but WOW...Boycott American Women was just......wow. The most recent post, dated today, is a list of things that is wrong with American women. I'd like to correct the author(s) in their stereotypical assumptions of women.
****DISCLAIMER****
These thoughts are from a man named Donald and there IS cursing. These thoughts are not mine, obviously.

American women..
- highest maintenance (I've never heard of a foreign bride demanding her husband buy expensive house & cars)
To this, I must laugh. I bought my OWN vehicle and it's a minivan. I don't demand anything from my husband. You are clearly just picking the wrong women.
- fattest in the world I'd love to see the stats for this from a reputable source.
- most likely to cheat  Yea, okay....I call MAJOR BS on this.
- highest rate of divorce (60% - US-US marriages; 20% - US-foreign marriages) Probably because men cheated. Again, let's see the stats and information behind WHY the divorce happened.
- largest payout in divorce court (you'll be ass-raped for everything you earned, plus most of what you will earn for years to come) That's funny...in my divorce, I got a broken down computer and he got both of the cars and all the money in the bank.
- bitchiest I really doubt that.
- most likely to nag constantly Nice opinion, but not can't be backed up.
- most likely to believe in feminism and "equality" This might be true and that's a good thing.
- most likely to hate men Well....if you are an example of this, do you blame us?
- spend least amount of time with her children I'm with my children 24/7, thanks.
- worst at cooking and cleaning Then why are American men getting fatter?
- fucked & chucked by tons of guys before tricking you into marriage  Wow.....because men are the prime examples of virgins.

These men also contradict themselves, alternating between calling American women fat and lazy, but then talking about how we are in constant searches of how to improve our health and enhance our careers. Which is it? You can be doing both!
I'm a stay at home mom. I get my husband up for work, more often than not, I have his clothes ready for him. I cook 99% of the meals in our house (my husband makes some FABULOUS burgers and ribs), I do the majority of the cleaning and laundry, I'm with my kids every single day, extremely active in their schooling, about to get them into sports and things like that. I do my own nails, usually do my own hair. I don't have an expensive vehicle by any means. I have a minivan that I bought 4 years ago that is now almost 13 years old. I'm the frugal one in the family and the last to get clothes, as the kids get theirs first (for school), then the husband (for work).
Hey, these guys have their own opinions, and that's fine. As one woman said on the site Cafemom "Aww, it's a blog for a socially awkward losers justifying why they had to buy their brides, how sweet...wonder if they are blogging from mommy's basement?

Speaking of mommy, I wonder how many of these men were raised by American women, and what their mothers would say if they saw this drivel..."
This pretty much sums up this blog.
And it makes me wonder what their mother's think!
I close this blog with an invitation for you all to share it if you want and to them men who are behind this to enlighten us with more of their oh so educational information about women.

31 comments:

  1. i find it strange that they talk about how fat women are when in reality i see far more FAT MEN in america. I see more women at the gym working out or at yoga classes WHILE PREGNANT EVEN then men who choose to sit in front of the tv playing their xbox, ps3, or computer games. Look outside how many women are out walking, jogging, biking and trying to stay in shape compared to men.
    Also i can say my husband has had more sexual partners than i have before we got together.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Single mothers are raising future criminals and social deliquents. Here is the PROOF:

    63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes (US Dept. Of Health/Census) – 5 times the average.

    90% of all homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes – 32 times the average.

    85% of all children who show behavior disorders come from fatherless homes – 20 times the average. (Center for Disease Control)

    80% of rapists with anger problems come from fatherless homes –14 times the average. (Justice & Behavior, Vol 14, p. 403-26)

    71% of all high school dropouts come from fatherless homes – 9 times the average. (National Principals Association Report)

    Father Factor in Education - Fatherless children are twice as likely to drop out of school.

    Children with Fathers who are involved are 40% less likely to repeat a grade in school.

    Children with Fathers who are involved are 70% less likely to drop out of school.

    Children with Fathers who are involved are more likely to get A’s in school.

    Children with Fathers who are involved are more likely to enjoy school and engage in extracurricular activities.

    75% of all adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers come from fatherless homes – 10 times the average.

    Father Factor in Drug and Alcohol Abuse - Researchers at Columbia University found that children living in two-parent household with a poor relationship with their father are 68% more likely to smoke, drink, or use drugs compared to all teens in two-parent households. Teens in single mother households are at a 30% higher risk than those in two-parent households.

    70% of youths in state-operated institutions come from fatherless homes – 9 times the average. (U.S. Dept. of Justice, Sept. 1988)

    85% of all youths in prison come from fatherless homes – 20 times the average. (Fulton Co. Georgia, Texas Dept. of Correction)

    Father Factor in Incarceration – Even after controlling for income, youths in father-absent households still had significantly higher odds of incarceration than those in mother-father families. Youths who never had a father in the household experienced the highest odds. A 2002 Department of Justice survey of 7,000 inmates revealed that 39% of jail inmates lived in mother-only households. Approximately forty-six percent of jail inmates in 2002 had a previously incarcerated family member. One-fifth experienced a father in prison or jail.

    Father Factor in Crime - A study of 109 juvenile offenders indicated that family structure significantly predicts delinquency. Adolescents, particularly boys, in single-parent families were at higher risk of status, property and person delinquencies. Moreover, students attending schools with a high proportion of children of single parents are also at risk. A study of 13,986 women in prison showed that more than half grew up without their father. Forty-two percent grew up in a single-mother household and sixteen percent lived with neither parent

    Father Factor in Child Abuse – Compared to living with both parents, living in a single-parent home doubles the risk that a child will suffer physical, emotional, or educational neglect. The overall rate of child abuse and neglect in single-parent households is 27.3 children per 1,000, whereas the rate of overall maltreatment in two-parent households is 15.5 per 1,000.

    Daughters of single parents without a Father involved are 53% more likely to marry as teenagers, 711% more likely to have children as teenagers, 164% more likely to have a pre-marital birth and 92% more likely to get divorced themselves.

    Adolescent girls raised in a 2 parent home with involved Fathers are significantly less likely to be sexually active than girls raised without involved Fathers.

    ReplyDelete
  3. 43% of US children live without their father [US Department of Census]

    90% of homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes. [US D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census]

    80% of rapists motivated with displaced anger come from fatherless homes. [Criminal Justice & Behaviour, Vol 14, pp. 403-26, 1978]

    71% of pregnant teenagers lack a father. [U.S. Department of Health and Human Services press release, Friday, March 26, 1999]

    63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes. [US D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census]

    85% of children who exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes. [Center for Disease Control]

    90% of adolescent repeat arsonists live with only their mother. [Wray Herbert, “Dousing the Kindlers,” Psychology Today, January, 1985, p. 28]

    71% of high school dropouts come from fatherless homes. [National Principals Association Report on the State of High Schools]

    75% of adolescent patients in chemical abuse centers come from fatherless homes. [Rainbows f for all God’s Children]

    70% of juveniles in state operated institutions have no father. [US Department of Justice, Special Report, Sept. 1988]

    85% of youths in prisons grew up in a fatherless home. [Fulton County Georgia jail populations, Texas Department of Corrections, 1992]

    Fatherless boys and girls are: twice as likely to drop out of high school; twice as likely to end up in jail; four times more likely to need help for emotional or behavioral problems. [US D.H.H.S. news release, March 26, 1999]

    ReplyDelete
  4. Women pointed to the fact that they were not 50% of some group as “evidence” of “negative discrimination against women” and demanded the government commit the CRIME of discrimination against men so they could get to 50%. Well?

    -War dead: 98% men
    -Workplace dead: 93% men
    -Incarcerated: 90% men
    -Homeless: 90% men
    -Alimony payers: 99% men
    -Child support payers: 99% men

    Have ANY women claimed “negative discrimination” against women in ANY of these six categories? Have ANY women started groups to campaign against the obvious oppression of women in keeping them under-represented in these six categories? No. It is TOTAL hypocrisy that they have NOT called their under representation in these areas “discrimination” and demanded the government make sure the same 50% outcomes are achieved in these areas.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You women murder your own children at a rate nearly NINE times that of the biological father:

    The US Office of Technology Assessment (1987): "The increase in the number of mother-headed households and the corresponding decrease in father-headed households paralleled a 158% increase in child abuse and neglect in the 8 years from 1976 to 1984. 2.3% of sexual abuse of girls was by biological fathers, and 17% by stepfathers. 37% of child maltreatment occurred in mother-headed households, versus 23% in all US families. 44,700 children were sexually abused in 1979 which was .07% of all children below the age of 18 years of age." In 1983, a study found that 60% of perpetrators of child abuse were women with sole custody. According to the Department of Justice, 55% of child murders are by their own mothers, and 6% are by their biological fathers, making mothers 9 times more likely to murder their children than biological fathers.

    The Third National Incidence Study of Child Abuse and Neglect (NIS-3) from the US Department of Health and Human Services paints an appalling picture.

    According to this report, children in mother-only households are 4 times more likely to be fatally abused than children in father-only households. Children in mother-only households are 40% more likely to be sexually abused than children in father-only households. Women (mothers and female care givers) are 78% of the perpetrators of fatal child abuse, 81% of natural parents who seriously abuse their children, 72% of natural parents who moderately abuse their children, and 65% of natural parents who are inferred to have abused their children. Natural mothers are the perpetrators of 93% of physical neglect, 86% of educational neglect, 78% of emotional neglect, 60% of physical abuse, and 55% of emotional abuse.

    Moreover, the lives of children are rarely improved when the custodial mother remarries. When the perpetrator of abuse is a non-natural parent, males [read: non-biological fathers] are the perpetrators of 90% of physical abuse, 97% of sexual abuse, 74% of emotional abuse, and 82% of educational neglect.

    Between 1986 and 1993, as the number of single-mother households increased dramatically, fatal child abuse increased 46% and serious child abuse increased four fold. Clearly, eliminating fathers from the lives of our children has been a cultural catastrophe unmatched in history."

    THE MAJORITY OF CHILD ABUSE AND CHILD MOLESTATION IS DONE BY WOMEN, not men.

    ReplyDelete
  6. A 1994 British study by Michelle Carrado and others, interviewed 1,800 men and women with heterosexual partners. Some 11% of the men but only 5% of the women said heir current partner had committed acts of violence towards them, ranging from pushing, through hitting, to stabbing. Five per cent of married or cohabiting men ported two or more acts of violence against them in a current relationship, compared with only 1% of women. A further 10% of men but 11% of women said they had ommitted one of these violent acts.

    Study after study shows women are not merely violent in self-defence but strike the first blow in about half of all disputes. The American social scientists Murray Straus and Richard Gelles reported from two large national surveys that husbands and wives had assaulted each other at approximately equal rates, with women engaging in minor acts of violence more frequently. Elsewhere, they found more wives than husbands were severely violent towards their spouses.

    Moreover, there is now considerable evidence that women initiate severe violence more frequently than men. A survey of 1,037 young adults born between 1972 and 1973 in Dunedin, New Zealand, found that 18.6% of young women said they had perpetrated severe physical violence against their partners, compared with 5.7% of young men. Three times more women than men said they had kicked or bitten their partners, or hit them with their fists or with an object. (Quoted: The Sunday Times, 24 October 1999, NEWS REVIEW, "Women are at least as violent as men, but the evidence is everywhere being dismissed or ignored", By Melanie Phillips."

    Oh women are not only more likely to assault men, they're more likely to KILL men.

    ReplyDelete
  7. You know FULL WELL that in the Family Courts the women commit perjury and make up lies about their husbands to get the children and the child support that goes with them.

    You know FULL WELL that 90%+ of the time that the children go with the mother.

    You know this is the case EVEN IF the woman had an affair and wishes to kick the husband out for the new boyfriend.

    You know FULL WELL that the spousal support and child support payments are often vastly higher than required to support the children.

    And YOU KNOW FULL WELL THERE IS A VAST BIAS TO THE MOTHER IN THE COURTS.

    AND YOU WOMEN DO NOTHING ABOUT THESE INJUSTICES. YOU JUST SHUT UP AND LET THEM HAPPEN. THAT IS YOUR ‘EQUALITY’!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. ^^^^ just wanted to point out that normally THE MAN LEAVES THE WOMAN LEAVING THE CHILD IN A FATHERLESS HOME YOU KNOW FULL WELL THAT HAPPENS!!!!
    Do you have a child??? No??? Wow then i am guessing you dont know much about how much it costs to raise them now do you?? hmmmmmm women support a grand more for children than a "father" ever will.
    by the way dick cheese i would like you to posts LINKS to your sources not just copy pastey and clickey like a dumbass. None of your "statistics" prove otherwise UNLESS you can do that........
    stop your generalization of women when i went to family court i never lied to get my children he didnt want the kids, he didnt want anything to do with our kids. I didnt want his child support either, stop being a chauvinistic pig and acting like women are some horrible parasite on the earth because if someone didnt birth you out of her vagina your ignorant dimwittedness wouldnt be spouting your ignorance.
    furthermore everything you commented had nothing to do with the article she was talking about you proved nothing but your lack of comprehension towards reading.......
    moron.......
    Maybe we should just take children away from there mother huh??? Give them to the fathers that didnt want them in the first place or put them in foster care that would be a graaaaaaaand idea because you know how well they treat children.



    There are only two types of statistics in this world:lies and false ones.
    good job sheeple.

    ReplyDelete
  9. maybe if the dads didnt cheat on their wives(i know you have dick sweety and cant admit that men cheat but in the REAL world they do it more than women do sorry......) there would be less of a divorce rate and less fatherless households.
    Maybe its time for men to step up and be dads rather than just walking out and creating more children with more women.

    ReplyDelete
  10. what did anything he wrote have to do with what the woman here typed????
    he just spouted off a bunch of statistics trying to downgrade single mother parenting(which normally isnt the moms fault).
    the woman who typed this isnt even a single mother i thought?
    wow talk about making yourself look like a asshole.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Wow! That's a lot of comments and a of nonsense.
    I was raised by a single mother. I have an education, I have no criminal background and I don't make up lies about anyone. I'm in a stable, happy marriage. I was not promiscuous as a teen, I didn't marry as a teen.
    I expected some of you women haters to come on here and spew your warped nonsense, but the fact is that American women aren't afraid to stand up for themselves against men. Plain and simple. We aren't as willing to submit as women from other countries.

    ReplyDelete
  12. was it the women who murdered their children or the BOYFRIENDS who did it? hmmm in which case that would fall under a MAN killing the child not the mommy. It would be a MANS fault. Which is what we are talking about.
    As a PP said before what you wrote has nothing to do with what the OP has said you just went on some belligerent rampage taking someone elses statistics and making them into your own which doesnt even prove anything. Of course the numbers will be higher with a mother because the mother is the one who gets primary custody because the father doesnt want it. Normally the only reason the father has anything to do with the child is because he doesnt want to pay child support why dont you go look up statistics on that one instead of listening to what faux news tells you to. You sound like some conservative republican who is gonna start spouting off about the sanctity of marriage and how its always the womans fault that they divorce. That she should have stayed and worked on her marriage even if the man was cheating on her and treating her like garbage.
    please do grow up hunny and realize the real world isnt fair and normally that unfairity falls on the mothers shoulders when he cheats and leaves her with nothing.

    ReplyDelete
  13. *shrugs*
    thank you i just dont see the point in what he wrote we are talking about what men think about american women, not about single parenting.
    and in even more fairness half of his statistics dont even come from America they are from Australia, New Zealand, Ireland and other countries so really they dont have anything to do with what you where talking about.
    We where talking about a blog by men who feel women should go back to the 1950's and be barefoot,pregnant,and in the kitchen BUT if the man happens to leave her she shouldnt expect any alimony, child support or welfare to help her take care of the children he left her with. But sadly these men dont realize that even if you marry a foreign woman and bring her back to America she can leave you and you are stuck paying for an alimony still......

    ReplyDelete
  14. the first comment is so far the only one that had anything to do with your blog post.

    ReplyDelete
  15. The hypocrisy of you women is amazing. Here is a case where a female school teacher had sex with four different students, and she only got FIVE MONTHS in jail as punishment.

    We all know that if a MALE TEACHER had had sex with four students, he would have gone to jail for AT LEAST TEN YEARS.

    But NO WHERE do we see you women DEMANDING EQUAL PUNISHMENT for this woman, the same punishment a MAN would have gotten. THAT IS REAL EQUALITY, but you hypocritical women don't want real equality. You just want special privledges.

    http://www.crimesagainstfathers.com/australia/Forums/tabid/82/forumid/115/threadid/2813/scope/posts/Default.aspx

    The hypocrisy of you women is absolutely disgusting.

    If you women are actually serious about "equal rights", then why not start by demanding that this woman should get the EXACT SAME PUNISHMENT that a man would have gotten for the SAME CRIME. Demand that this FEMALE PEDOPHILE TEACHER should get at LEAST TEN YEARS IN JAIL!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  16. @Anonymous
    What's amazing is you're assuming the women here are hypocrites and would support a female pedophile and not a male pedophile. Really amazing considering how none mentioned pedophiles.

    No we don't all know if a male teacher had sex with 4 students he would have gone to jail for at least 10 years considering how many male molesters and rapists get off with a few months or parole as sex crimes are generally considered a heresay crime.

    Perhaps you should find the jurers and judge amazing and absolutely disgusting rather than a gender who most members had nothing to do with the determining the punishment.

    FYI I highly doubt most men want real equality either as many support and defend the slut double standard. Seems men just want equality when it comes to punishment or paying.

    ReplyDelete
  17. @Anonymous
    It's not total hypocrisy that women haven't called under representation in these areas "discrimination" as with the exception of homeless these areas are determined legally
    so the only possibility for discrimination in these areas is incarceration and that's discrimination on the length of incarceration.

    War dead: legally determined by who chose to go to war as the draft has been disbanded for quite some time
    Workplace dead: legally determined by who chose the job
    Incarcerated: legally determined by who committed a crime or falsely imprisoned
    Alimony & child support payers: legally determined by who earns more (men generally earn 25% more than women)

    ReplyDelete
  18. @Anonymous
    Amusing how you cite outdated research it seems you're ignoring the current statistics likely because they don't mesh with your mindset. As well as overlooking that perhaps women commit the vast majority of child abuse as the vast majority of children are solely or mainly raised by women as many children don't have a father and most fathers aren't that involved in their childrens lives.

    Can't speak for partner violence in the New Zealands however in my country America according to past and present statistics men are far more violent than women as the rate of injury seriousness to death is high for women and quite low for men.

    On child custody cases seems you may not know that only 33% of men want sole custody of their children.
    Perhaps there is a vast bias to the mother in child custody courts thanks to a patriachial view of women are caregivers/nuturers and men are providers which translates to women get the kids and men pay for the kids.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I liked this blog post however I read the commenrs and just couldn't stop myself from responding to what I felt was misleading likely misogynistic propaganda.

    Apologies to the blogger if my comments diverted from the blog post.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Wow, this is so funny. This guy really got you women in a tizzy. As long as opinions are being tossed out there, I guess I'll share. I mean, you all are holding your breath, right? Edge of your seat? No?
    Personally, I'd want an American or Anglo-Saxon woman as a wife or mother to my children. That said, I'm sure there are many decent American women out there. I think we live in such a monoculture that we Anglo types never get a realistic look at others, everything being filtered through our news media. In India, despite the horrors you see on FOX or MSNBC, children are really loved. Those mothers keep their babies with them always, always talking to them, bouncing them, loving them. And the average America has her boy circumcised (at what, two days?), suck in a seperate room, and is allowed to "cry it out," when he or she needs to be held. Geez, my wife breast fed and slept with the kids. As horrible as my American mother treated me, my wife was so warm and kind and beautifull to my kids.

    Well, now I'm bawling like a little bitch! She passed on four years ago, but we all love her just as much as we ever did.

    No, based on personal experiance, I'd advise anyone to look at the culture of the woman you are considering. Culture is a more powerful force than most realize. America is steeped in fear and violence and hate, and if she is unable to change, I'm happy to see her in this diminishing state.

    Sorry, if this is incoherant. I began it laughing at how emotional everyone was, and then I became emotional!

    Best wishes to you all, regardless of genitalia or nationality.
    LJ

    ReplyDelete
  21. @Anonymous
    "In India, despite the horrors you see on FOX or MSNBC, children are really loved. Those mothers keep their babies with them always, always talking to them, bouncing them, loving them. And the average America has her boy circumcised (at what, two days?), suck in a seperate room, and is allowed to "cry it out," when he or she needs to be held. Geez, my wife breast fed and slept with the kids."


    What is so funny to me is how there's no mention of the father or how you treated the kids. Always amusing to see how women seem to be held accountable and blamed/shamed for parenting and men seem to be overlooked.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's because the topic was american women. I spent much time with my kids then and even more now. I'm not as good at it as she was, but I love them and try.

      Try the Art of Loving by Eric Fromm. Sorry, my italics thingie is dead. If any of you have read it, I'm curious to know what you all thought of it.

      I believe the guy who started Boycott probably has issues, but so do most all of us. I tell you, I used to travel a lot and lived about one third of my life overseas. Penis envy may affect all women, but for american women, wow, major issue. It seems that they want to be men, that they value nothing about female characteristics. They seem to scorn empathy and compassion and lust for power over others. But among people who have no concept of the divine or even believe in intuition (let alone use it) what can be expected.

      Meditate for a time and you know that in when we leave these physical forms we are neither male nor female. That exists only in the world of duality.

      Anyway, this keyboard is motivating me to give this up and get some sleep.

      TJ

      Delete
  22. @Anonymous
    I highly doubt most all of use have issues to the extent that it seems the guys in the Boycott American gals do.

    Perhaps it's not that American gals have penis envy or want to be guys but that they aren't acting as you think they should or adhering to your ideal of femininity and whats make a gal a gal. It's quite possible as it seems most times when American guys say American gals want to be guys they actually mean that gals aren't behaving as he thinks they should.

    It's ironic how you say that 'when we leave these physical forms we are neither male or female' yet at the same time about American women say 'they want to be men, that they value nothing about female characteristics'.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I give myself a grand total of two hours per day to do nothing of consequence: watch a move, read a horror novel, stare at a wall, look at silly things on the internet, but usually I take the nap of bliss (no guilt). Arguing with you is disrupting my schedualed mindlessness. And besides that, I see no point in continuing this, since I believe the point of your argument is simply "to win." And now I need to take more time to evaluate my own reasons...

      Anyway, I should, I guess, explain myself, just in case I'm reading you wrong. But Vedic philosophy in 50 words or less? Tough.

      Skipping...nearly everything, we could say that this material world is the world of duality. It's a "place" where all things have a polar opposite. Most of us have heard the terms yin and yang; these are the Chinese words that describe feminine/masculine energies. A good way for us Westerners to understand these things is to read up quantum mechanics. In our way (positive, masculine, yang, rational) coming to an understand what mystics have always understood. Although, in my opinion the rational method will never give up complete truth.

      These ideas are new or limited to any culture or region. Shiva and Shakti from Hinduism are the Adam and Eve of Christianity. Oh, the fundamentalist interpretation of Genisis, where that ho, Eve, effs up all creation is unfortunate. But for people who are purely materialistic, they can see things in an easy simplistic way: fundamentalism or now, what they imagine is science--it also has its high priests.
      Clearly native Americans were familiar with these same concepts. They were still refering to Father Sun and Mother Earth only 100 years ago; probably, some still do. They left obvious signs in their earthworks.

      Delete
    2. Okay, so in this world where one thing must flow into its opposite, everything is divided into positive or negative form, as a battery or the earth has its poles. But nothing can be 100 percent masculine or feminine.
      Masculine traits are considered to be left brain stuff: logic, reason, extroversion (in the original Jungian sense), agression, and (this is just my opinion) loyalty. I guess I'd have to add domination to that list, in both its positive and negative contexts
      The feminine side would include, well, the opposite of all that
      stuff. Emotion/feeling is more pronounced in most females. So we can see greater compassion, empathy, but also, as Jung noted, emotion is the raw material for intuition. Intuition is how Truth is percieved. Logic and reason, or as Jung used to say, critical rationalism is great. It has cured diseases and gave us the internet--the pornography distrubution network. But it is nothing compared to intuition which bypasses all book learning (which contains errors) and give an instant and sure KNOWING.

      I have been blessed, even though I am little more than an ape, to have several intuitional flashes that have changed my life. My wife helped me to use it in more mundane ways. She would congratulate someone or express condolances...often before she was told the news. She told an aquaintance of mine she was sorry about the loss of this woman's son. The woman went pale. My wife mentioned that it was so soon after the tragedy. The woman said, "I just had an abortion." Awkward. But that was life with her. Or one day she said, "Don't be so flattered by that redhead with the big butt. She's already turned on you." Yup. I said no to that woman and man she was p.o.ed. god only knows why; I'm no catch.
      But this ability can be used for more profound things as well.

      Delete
    3. YAAÀA, forget logic! I didn't offer a sacrifice to the tiny demon that lives inside this forking machine and it deleted half of my drivel...obviously a female entity haunting my machine.

      Anyhoo, yeah, you were right, I doubt many women would want to be men.

      I do believe in penis envy, but I thing Frued got the cause wrong. In a mythological way I think women see it as a threat. They've getting raped since humans have existed.

      Disagree, I do think you undervalue the feminine. Culture--powerfull stuff to overcome, and ours is at a primative place. Ready to blow up Iran! Come on, it'll be fun!

      Not that screwed up? Try this if you really wanna cry a river: ask God or the universe or the collective consciousness or tje Borg, or whatever you believe in to show you your flaws. Demand to see them. Umm, maybe that's not great advice...meditate and they will be revealed.

      Just because you fit into this society doesn't make you healthy, probably just the opposite.

      A better thread (though I won't be here for it) would be "what causes suffering?" Or "How can I be a better ___ by observing other cultures."

      Best wishes to ya, pixie.
      Tj

      Delete
  23. @Anonymous
    I didn't see this as an argument. I did see this as saying what I found amusing or ironic in your posts as recall my own words:
    "What is so funny to me"
    "It's ironic how you say"

    I have no argument I was just posting what I found amusing or ironic in your posts. You are reading me wrong unless it's arguing for me to:
    - doubt most have issues to the extent the Boycott America guys do
    - think it's possible that gals don't want to be guys but rather they're not adhering to your ideal of femininity and whats make a gal a gal

    Though I not sure how stating a doubt and a possiblity is arguing just to win.

    Absolutely amusing how you say don't want to disrupt your time with arguing yet you post separately three times to as it seems to me backpedal out of how you said 'when we leave these physical forms we are neither male or female' yet at the same time about American women say 'they want to be men, that they value nothing about female characteristics'.

    Going by your posts I do think my possibility is an extrenely likely one. Perhaps it's not that gals are undervaluing the feminine but rather they're not adhering to your feminine definition. Thus because they're not feminine in your eyes they're undervaluing the feminine.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Hmm. Before we start verbally attacking the other sex, how about we stop for a minute and think... Lets cut down the generalization. Yes, bad things may happen with mothers. Yes, bad things may happen with fathers. But is it you or me doing these things? The reason this website was being called out was because of its generalizations. Neither men nor women are perfect, but statistics don't prove that every man or every woman is evil.
    Think, people, please!

    ReplyDelete
  25. Hey, I'm one of those guys(courtesy of 1 bad experience) that got on the whole "Foreign women are so much hotter, better than American females" thing. Then I got here to University. And I see....UGGH, they're NOT! Everywhere I look, American blondes/brunettes, wearing those popular Nike tempo shorts, serious curves, and confident. Because they KNOW! They ARE the best, and us guys HAVE to respect them! At first I tried to ignore them, keep the facade up. Ugh, I can't! Foreign girls don't come CLOSE to the blondes/brunettes like this on Uni's in the U.S., you can't beat em! Any guys talking that crap, only do it because they're behind a computer screen. Put them on a Uni campus around these ladies like I mentioned, and we ALL KNOW what their reaction will be, the SAME AS MINE! They're just talking that crap to prop up their egos, that's the TRUTH ladies! I've DEFINITELY adjusted my attitude and admitted it, there's no use lying and denying it! I wish I hadn't now!

    ReplyDelete
  26. What a retarded Rebuttal towards that "boycott american women" comment. In fact, the US has some of the fattest people in North America. Fatter than Canadians! I've seen MANY morbidly obese women in the States when I came to visit. I'm Canadian by the way!

    ReplyDelete

So....what did you think? And are you THAT Sarah Michelle?